| Ashley McDowell: | Home page | Kalamazoo College | Department of Philosophy | My work | My teaching |
| Current course pages: | Recent syllabi | Teaching history | Student resources: | ||
| Metaphysics and Mind | Biomedical Ethics | Study guides by me | Links | ||
PHIL 308: Metaphysics and Mind
Syllabus
Spring 2004: MWF 2:40 - 3:55, Humphrey House Lounge
Instructor: Dr. Ashley McDowell
Office: 202 Humphrey House
Office phone: 337-7077
email me
Course Website: http://kzoo.edu/~mcdowell/M&M.htm
Office Hours: Mondays & Wednesdays 4 - 5, Tuesdays & Thursdays 3 - 5
and by appointment
(unless a change is announced)
M&M coffee: Thursdays, 9-10 am, The Daily Grind
Textbooks:
· Brian Cooney: The Place of Mind, 2000: Wadsworth (TPM)
· Douglas Hofstadter and Daniel Dennett: The Mind's I, 1981: Bantam (TMI)
· (optional, but recommended) Peter van Inwagen and Dean Zimmerman: Metaphysics:
The Big Questions, 1998: Blackwell (MTBQ)
Course Description
This course is about philosophical issues in the areas of metaphysics and philosophy
of mind, and at their intersection. Metaphysics is the study of the nature of
reality, and philosophy of mind studies metaphysical issues having to do with
minds. A philosophical study of these topics is one in which we give thoughtful
reasons for positions on various issues. In this course, through lecture and
discussion, you will learn about the views of prominent historical and contemporary
philosophers on some key issues in metaphysics and mind.
In particular, we will focus on four main topics. The first issue is that of
"identity" and "personal identity." This involves questions
of what makes an object, and in particular a person, "the same" over
time. If we replace every plank on a ship gradually, is it the same ship at
the end of the process? Every molecule in your body is replaced about every
seven years - are you a new person after the last molecule goes? If not, what
does make you the same person - your memories, personality, a causal link to
the past, or what? The second issue we'll discuss, the "mind/body problem,"
involves questions about the nature of mind and its relation to body. Is the
mind a nonphysical soul-like entity, or is the mind the brain, or is it the
software that runs on the brain's hardware, or is it something else? The next
issue is really a subissue of the mind/body problem: the "problem"
of consciousness. Can the qualitative part of our experience - the part involving
what it feels like to be in various states - be captured in purely physical
terms, or is it inescapably nonphysical? The final issue is that of free will.
Does modern scientific knowledge entail that none of our actions is really free?
What is it for an action to be free, anyway? What kinds of restrictions might
there be on our freedom - for example, if time travel is possible, are we free
to change the past?
In studying these issues we will be doing a variety of readings. Most of them
will be academic philosophical articles, although some from The Mind's I
will stray into supporting material from literature and science fiction. The
ideas and arguments in all of the readings will be deep and challenging. You
should expect to do most readings more than once. As we will discuss, there
will be important interconnections and dependency relations among the readings,
so you must also keep up with the reading assignments.
The class will be a combination of lecture and discussion, and all students will be expected to contribute. In-class discussions will be conducted with respect and a mutual interest in solving these problems, so that all views will be open to thoughtful criticism. We will be approaching other views - and our own - with an open-minded but critical eye. The focus will be on providing and assessing arguments for positions, to try to come to the most thoughtful position possible on these questions. Students will be evaluated on how well you have learned the views and arguments of the authors studied, and how well you formulate original arguments for your own positions.
Class Format
This class will consist of a combination of lecture and discussion. I will spend
time every day taking your questions about the reading and the previous class's
material, and we will then go over and talk about the current day's material.
I will generally assume that you have understood the material, unless you indicate
otherwise. I welcome questions, as they are one of the only ways for me to know
what is unclear to you.
You will be responsible for completing the readings before each class, and for
being prepared to discuss those readings. Give yourself plenty of time to do
these readings carefully - again, they can be quite difficult. I may give you
occasional in-class or out-of-class assignments, which will rely upon sincere
attempts to understand the readings. In addition, you will write short (one-page)
essays weekly, and these will be graded largely on the basis of how much you
have genuinely grappled with the course material.
I expect regular attendance in this class. Although attendance makes up no official
percentage of your grade, missing class will negatively affect it. Repeatedly
missing class may result in a substantial lowering of your grade for the course.
There will be two avenues for further discussion of class materials: office
hours and weekly lunches. Office hours are held for purposes such as discussing
course materials, helping you understand readings, working on philosophical
skills, and going over drafts of assignments. Please take full advantage of
them. Additionally, I will be in The Daily Grind for a "Metaphysics and
Mind" coffee hour every Thursday morning from 9 to 10. This weekly coffee
hour is for us to informally discuss ideas brought up in class, perhaps in more
depth than we can manage during class hours. Please feel free to drop by - caffeinate
and philosophize yourself.
Course Requirements and Grading Scheme
Papers (75%)
You will be writing three papers for this course, of approximately 8 - 10 pages
each. You will have the opportunity to choose three of four possible papers
to write: the due dates will be in weeks 4, 7, 9, and 11 (exam week), and will
be on topics centered around the four main segments of the course (identity,
mind/body, consciousness, free will). You may only turn in three papers. Each
paper will be worth 25% of your grade.
The point of these papers is to construct and present a philosophical argument
for a thesis. One goal is to apply for yourself the principles of reasoning,
insight, philosophical writing, and argumentation modeled and taught in this
class. The other goal is to craft a carefully considered position on an issue,
grappling with fundamental problems in your own way. These will not be research
papers, and I actively discourage you from looking at sources other than those
assigned in class.
I will be able to look at rough drafts, either turned in or during office hours;
I will let you know details as the time gets nearer. I also encourage you to
run rough drafts by each other or your peers at the Writing Center.
Weekly essays (15%)
Every Monday, you will turn in a one-page (double-spaced) typed essay on a topic
I will give you by Friday of the previous week. These papers will generally
involve you thinking about the material we've been discussing or reading in
a personal way, either grappling with your own view on a topic or applying ideas
from the course to things in your own life. These papers may be shared with
the class, unless you ask me (on the paper) not to do so.
The point of the essays is to integrate your academic learning of the material
into your personal life and thinking, and to have the experience of constructing
statements of your own reactions to the topics studied. They are meant to help
you see the material as relevant to your life, and to see yourself as able to
take a place in the ongoing debate about philosophical issues. I will grade
these on the basis of how well I see you trying to do those things, not on the
basis of your ability to regurgitate facts from the readings, or parrot back
to me thoughts I or the philosophers studied have expressed.
Participation and occasional in-class or out-of-class assignments (10%)
This will be a participation-intensive course. In a philosophy class of this
kind, discussion is absolutely essential, and may be the way you learn most
about the material. I know that participation is difficult for some people,
but you can consider this a safe place to practice contributing to a group discussion,
which you will surely need to do throughout your life. I will require and ensure
that conversation in class, although probably critical of ideas, will not be
critical of people. I expect that we will get to know each other well enough
to feel comfortable talking relatively quickly. I also intend to make it apparent
that you will not be thought worse of for saying anything, as long as you are
speaking respectfully.
I will keep general track of your contributions in class. Keep in mind that
contributions can take various forms, including asking for clarification, participation
in group discussion, and giving helpful examples. Keep in mind also that more
does not necessarily mean better: those who excessively dominate discussions,
speak disrespectfully, or otherwise use their voices in a negative way may be
penalized for doing so. If you are in doubt, ask me.
I may occasionally ask you to do an in-class or homework assignment, designed
to help facilitate learning and/or discussion. I will let you know details of
such assignments as they come up.
Class conduct
Class conduct does not carry an official weight in this course, but will be
taken into account at final grade time. Your conduct in this class includes
improvement and effort. It also includes issues of respectful behavior, such
as tardiness, distracting behavior, or disrespectful behavior towards members
of the class or me.
Assignment responsibilities
All assignments must be turned in as hard (paper) copies - no emailed assignments
will be accepted except by special permission. It is your responsibility to
retain copies of all assignments you turn in, in a reliable format. Late assignments
will be assessed a grade penalty of half a grade for each day late, except in
the most extreme extenuating circumstances (for instance, severe illness). The
formal requirements for all assignments will be announced in detail well ahead
of time, either in class, by email, on the website, or all three.
A note on changing grades: if you feel you have been assigned a grade
unfairly or inaccurately, you should by all means talk to me about it. My only
requirement is that you prepare an argument (a set of reasons and facts) before
you do so.
A note on reading: don't succumb to the misconception that in order to
read something you only have to move your eyes over the lines, or "read
it out loud in your head," so to speak. What I expect is that you will
read the material in a more sophisticated way, thinking as you go. You should
be asking yourself the main points, making sure you understand the structure
of the reading, thinking about how this reading relates to others you've done,
and otherwise working to comprehend the material, not just to complete a technical
"reading" of it. You might try highlighting, underlining, making marginal
notes, or outlining - whatever helps you focus and understand. By the way, don't
forget to read the footnotes or endnotes as well as the main text in your readings;
and to read any reflections, introductions, and review questions that directly
accompany the readings.
Grading scheme:
Papers: 25% each (75% total)
Weekly essays (average of all): 15%
Participation and other assignments: 10%
Academic integrity and the Honor System
"It is always important to think of the intellectual world as a community
of mutual dependence, mutual helpfulness, mutual protectiveness, and common
delight. We take ideas from others and we give them to others. We are indebted
to others, and others are indebted to us. In sharing and acknowledging the community,
we define ourselves more certainly as individuals. The ability to describe our
sources is also an ability to define our own originality and our own selves.
All communities depend on generosity, trust, definition, and the proper use
of sources is part of the mortar that holds the community of the mind together."
- Richard Marius, Expository Writing Program, Harvard University
In this class, as in all classes at Kalamazoo College, we will be operating
under the Honor System. It is important that you familiarize yourself with that
system, and so I am attaching a copy of the College's statement of it. You should
also familiarize yourself with proper procedures for collaborating, doing research,
and citing sources. Should you have any questions about citations, plagiarism,
or honor system issues, please visit or contact me.
Any assignment you turn in that I find to violate academic integrity, either
through dishonesty, plagiarism, lack of appropriate citations, or unauthorized
collaboration, will receive a grade of 0. Any further instance of a violation
of academic integrity will be punished by a failing grade in the class as a
minimum sanction.
Special needs
If you have any special needs that I can accommodate, please let me know as
soon as possible.
Office hours
My office hours are posted above. They will be conducted on a first-come, first-served
basis, unless you make a prior appointment with me. I am also available at other
times by appointment. You should feel absolutely free to come to them and discuss
the course, the material, the assignments, or philosophy.
I request that each of you take a few minutes to visit me during my office hours
sometime in the first week of classes. It will be an opportunity for us to chat
one-on-one for the first time, and to get to know each other a bit more.
Schedule of Readings
This schedule is tentative. Any changes will be announced in class and by email, and most likely on the website as well. The reading assignments listed for each day must be completed before that class. Readings are found in your textbooks as indicated, or will be made available by handout or on the Internet.
WEEK ONE
M 3/29 Introduction to Class, Metaphysics, and Philosophy of Mind
PART ONE:
IDENTITY AND PERSONAL IDENTITY
W 3/31 Dennett, "Where Am I?" and Hawley, "Where Was I?"
(TMI 13 & 14)
F 4/2 Borges, "Borges and I" (TMI 1) and Chisholm, "Identity
Through Time" (MTBQ 19)
WEEK TWO
M 4/5 Locke, "Of Identity and Diversity" (TPM 29)
W 4/7 Parfit, Selections from Reasons and Persons (TPM 31), and Quine, "Identity"
(MTBQ 21)
F 4/9 Lewis, "In Defense of Stages," Geach, "Some Problems about
Time," and Lewis, "The Problem of Temporary Intrinsics" (MTBQ
22, 23, and 24)
WEEK THREE
M 4/12 Dennett, "Why Everyone Is a Novelist" (TPM 33)
W 4/14 Lem, "The Princess Ineffabelle" (TMI 6) and Shoemaker, "Self
and Substance" (TPM 34)
PART TWO:
THE MIND/BODY PROBLEM
F 4/16 Descartes, from Meditations (TPM 1), and introduction and postscript
to Ryle, "Descartes' Myth" (TPM 2)
WEEK FOUR
M 4/19 Elizabeth of Bohemia, from correspondence with Descartes (handout), and
Smullyan, "An Unfortunate Dualist" (TMI 23)
W 4/21 Place, "Is Consciousness a Brain Process?" and Smart, "Sensations
and Brain Processes" (TPM 5 and 6)
F 4/23 no class - Dr. McDowell out of town - but read Cooney, "Brain Events"
(TPM 4)
WEEK FIVE
M 4/26 Rorty, "Mind-Body Identity, Privacy, and Categories" (TPM 8)
W 4/28 P.M. Churchland, "Eliminative Materialism" (TPM 9)
F 4/30 Armstrong, "The Nature of Mind" and Fodor, "Materialism"
(TPM 10 and 11)
WEEK SIX
M 5/3 Hofstadter, "Prelude
Ant Fugue" (TMI 11)
W 5/5 Searle, "Minds, Brains, and Programs (TMI 22)
PART THREE:
THE PROBLEM OF CONSCIOUSNESS
F 5/7 Nagel, "What Is It Like to Be a Bat?" (TPM 22; also read reflections
in TMI) and Jackson, "Epiphenomenal Qualia" (TPM 24)
WEEK SEVEN
M 5/10 P.S. Churchland and P.M. Churchland, "Functionalism, Qualia, and
Intentionality" (TPM 25)
W 5/12 McGinn, "Can We Solve the Mind-Body Problem?" (TPM 26)
F 5/14 Chalmers, "Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness" (TPM
27)
WEEK EIGHT
M 5/17 Loar, "Phenomenal States" (TPM 28)
W 5/19 (Day of Gracious Living? If not, adjust schedule accordingly)
PART FOUR:
FREE WILL AND DETERMINISM
F 5/21 Lewis, "The Paradoxes of Time Travel" (MTBQ 17) and Prior,
"The Notion of the Present" (MTBQ 7)
WEEK NINE
M 5/24 Dawkins, "Selfish Genes and Selfish Memes" (TMI 10)
W 5/26 Hobart, "Free Will as Involving Determination and Inconceivable
without It" (MTBQ 39)
F 5/28 Chisholm, "Human Freedom and the Self" (MTBQ 40)
WEEK TEN
M 5/31 Memorial Day Holiday - no class
W 6/2 van Inwagen, "The Mystery of Metaphysical Freedom" (MTBQ 41)
F 6/4 O'Connor, "The Agent as Cause" (MTBQ 42)